A new study by the University of Queensland’s Department of Ecology and Hydrology found that people are more likely to avoid ecotours in cities and towns.
Key points: The study found that when people are forced to choose between the safety of their home and the safety and quality of the environment, they are less likely to take the safety into account when deciding whether to go on a journey ecotouring article “I think we all would say that’s pretty bad,” said Professor David Hodge, an ecologist and lecturer in environmental economics at the University.
What I’d like to see is the government, as an organisation, to be able to say, ‘Look, this is the safety that you should be focusing on and this is what you should invest in’. “
If you don’t have the choice to go and go away, people are less motivated to travel to a destination.”
What I’d like to see is the government, as an organisation, to be able to say, ‘Look, this is the safety that you should be focusing on and this is what you should invest in’.
“I think that would be the first step in actually making it easier for people to take more decisions.”
Professor Hodge said it was not clear what the exact reason was behind people avoiding ecots.
He said it could be that the people involved had a poor understanding of what it was like to travel, or that they were not aware of how the environment was maintained.
He said more research was needed into how ecotowns impacted the health of the local community.
Professor Hinx said it would be great if the Government would be able have a discussion about whether ecotouchers were safe, but it was hard to see the Government making a decision on that, because it is an ongoing debate.
It was a bit of a shame, he said.
If you want to make a difference, you need to think about it, he added.
The University of Brisbane has developed a research model called the ‘Ecotourist Experience’ which uses data collected over the past 15 years to understand how people use ecotouching services to find places to eat and drink.
The study has found that ecotoughers are much more likely than non-ecotourists to choose to stay away from a community, and to be more likely if they have a history of being a victim of crime or domestic violence.
Professor Hockney said it seemed the researchers were making some headway in understanding why people were choosing not to visit the parks, and were more likely not to travel ecoturfing.
“They may have a sense of safety, and they may be worried about what’s happening to their family and their friends,” he said of the people who had opted out of ecotowers.
But he said there was a lot more work to be done before the public would be more open to the idea of ecovillage.
“We need to know the extent to which we are seeing an increase in the amount of ecottourists in the community,” he added, “and how people are feeling about this and how they are responding to this.”
Topics:environment,environmental-impact,environment,people,environment-management,education,health,human-interest,travel-and-tourism,community-and_relationships,community,health-and/or-diseases-and,communitywork,healthcare,travel,environmentaustraliaMore stories from New South Wales